Search Dante7.com:



Welcome to www.dante7.com. The personal web site of Dante Picciano and friends.
July 2007 Archives

MORE FAILED PROMISES FROM POLITICIANS

July 5, 2007

Dear Editor:

I wrote last month in the anticipation that the Stop Taxing Our Properties (STOP) plan may come up for a vote in the Pennsylvania Legislature. The STOP legislation has been around for approximately three years and, Pennsylvania citizens will be disappointed to know that once again, despite repeated promises, our lawmakers have failed us.

I was in contact with Senator Logan who DID reintroduce the plan in the Senate and it was referred to a committee on June 24th according to the Senate website. Despite my earlier enthusiasm, Representative McCall’s promise to bring the measure to a vote in June did not come to fruition and I can’t find that STOP has even been re-introduced in the House this session. If I am in error, someone please send me the Bill Number as it is not available on the General Assembly website.

Why someone would be against eliminating ALL property taxes (not just school property taxes) on the homes people live in is beyond me. We have two leaders in adjacent counties here, Rep. McCall & Rep. Argall, who are their respective party Whips and every two years run for re-election on their seniority and leadership credentials claiming to have the clout necessary to get things done. Yet a property tax plan that is doable and that has been around for a number of years can’t be brought up for a vote before their two-month session break. The state budget deadline is not a viable excuse - it comes every year and this plan has preceded three budgets now without adoption.

I noticed that on June 27th Rep. Argall put out a preemptive press release in anticipation of this follow-up letter saying he now supports the plan (which he did not say in his last election campaign, rather he criticized his opponent for supporting it) and that the STOP plan is now being "reconciled" with the Commonwealth Caucus Plan by a bi-partisan group of legislators. How long are things going to be "reconciled" and this type of stalling take place?

No matter which party controls which chamber of the Pennsylvania Legislature, nothing has gotten done to eliminate ALL property taxes on people’s homes. We have "self-proclaimed leaders that we have consistently re-elected in the Carbon/Schuylkill area. Since this keeps happening, one possible conclusion is that people in this area aren’t concerned about eliminating their own property taxes and perhaps are just happy to just get grants for recycling and facade improvements while our lawmakers and Governor continue to provide hundreds of millions of dollars of corporate welfare to billion dollar corporations and individuals like owners of professional sports teams, ComCast, and PNC Bank.

And it’s just a coincidence that those associated with the like contribute huge sums of money to political campaigns of our elected officials, right?

I don’t even own a home, but it isn’t it about time for a Keystone Opportunity Zone for those who do?

I hope that Mr. Henry Woods (who commented on my last letter) and I aren’t the only ones disappointed with the lack of progress on the elimination of ALL property taxes for homeowners. That is certainly not what I hear daily but the results from the ballot box speak differently.

In closing- Keep doing what you’ve always done, and you’ll keep getting what’ve you always got…in this instance- NO MEANINGFUL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF.

Michael J. Polyak
Tamaqua, PA 18252


THROW THE BUMS OUT

July 14, 2007

All we read about in the newspapers and see on television are stories about the number of jobs that our politicians have created, about their efforts to lower property taxes, what they are doing to stop the dumping and what they are doing about our cancer and other health problems.

The truth is the politicians’ claims about the number of jobs created are greatly exaggerated; our property taxes are constantly increasing; we are forever being assaulted with contaminated, hazardous and toxic wastes from outside the county; and our cancer rates continue to climb.

One reason for our continued problems is that our politicians have their priorities screwed up. First and foremost, they care about their own political careers. Second, they care about their political parties. Third, they care about their financial supporters, especially lobbyists. If there is anything left over, and there seldom is, it goes to their constituents who are at the bottom of their list.

Politicians showed that they place their own political careers first when they voted for their illegal pay raises. On July 7, 2005, they gave themselves a 16% to 34% pay increase. The vote took place at two in the morning without public review or commentary and Governor Rendell signed the bill into law.

Second, our politicians care about their political parties. For example, both elected Republicans and Democrats place fundraising for their respective parties near the top of their priorities. Why do local politicians spend time in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Erie, etc. raising funds for their parties? Shouldn’t they first be spending more time working for their constituents on property tax relief, stopping the dumping, gaining more local control, and getting the government to do something about the cancer and other health problems in our area? However, fundraising means advancement within the party and that is more important than tending to the needs of their constituents.

Third, they care about their financial supporters, especially lobbyists. Did you ever notice that when an industrial project that is scheduled to receive government support is threatened, the politicians come out of the woodwork to get full funding returned to the project? If you look into their political contributions, you will see that the owners of the project or their lobbyists were heavy contributors to the politicians. If the politicians worked half as hard for us as they do for their contributors and lobbyists, there really would be job creation, elimination of property taxes, elimination of the dumping and real investigations into the causes and prevention of our cancers and other health related problems.

There are 203 members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and 50 members of the Senate. Based on our election results, it is safe to say that we believe that the other 202 representatives and 49 senators are the cause of the problem and not our representative and senator. The truth is that our elected officials are just as guilty as the other members of the General Assembly. Yet, we continue to reelect these ineffective officials. We must conclude that we are to blame for allowing such a deterioration of our present system of government into such a system of disrepair.

We have the to solve all of our problems if we would just use it. The next time there is an election, we should vote the bums out and give someone else a chance. Get off of your couch, put down your beer and vote. We should continue to throw the bums out until we get people who are willing to place the concerns of their constituents first. Anything less would be ridiculous.


FREE MONEY FOR POLLUTERS

Posted July 20, 2007

Our government is giving free money to polluters. In an effort to reduce our dependence on oil, Congress has provided tax credits for the synthetic-fuel or synfuel industry. However, synfuel is defined as nothing more than coal or waste coal sprayed with almost anything, such as diesel fuel, pine-tar resin, limestone or even hazardous waste. This magical process for transforming coal or waste coal into synfuel is referred to as "spray and pray."

The use of synfuel is not a new energy resource. It is simply a way for the coal industry to collect huge tax subsidies at our expense. Time Magazine www.time.com has estimated that 55 plants across the U.S. use coal or waste coal as synfuel in their operations and that between 2003 and 2005, the synfuel industry received $9 billion, that is with a “b,” in tax credits.

For example, Progress Energy Inc. of Raleigh, NC operates electric utilities that serve portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. Between 2002 and 2004, the company had $400 million in losses from the operation of its synfuel operations. However, it received $852 million in synfuel tax credits, thereby magically converting a $400 million loss into a $452 million profit! Moreover, this magical conversion was at taxpayer expense.

What a country! The polluters get paid for disposing of hazardous waste and then receive a tax credit for burning waste coal sprayed with the hazardous waste. To add insult to injury, our governor refers to the burning of waste coal as "renewable energy."

A recent article in the Pottsville Republican-Herald, "Alternative energy growing in Schuylkill," July 8, 2007, stated "By 2010, a state requirement will make it necessary for … electric utilities to purchase 9 percent of their power from renewable sources. Those sources for Pennsylvania will include … cogeneration, waste coal, coal gasification…." Where I went to school, coal was not a renewable energy source. This is nothing more than another government flimflam operation for the coal industry at the taxpayers’ expense.

From where do these program come? They come from the hands of our politicians who are merely tools of industry, especially the polluters. The polluters write the laws and the politicians have them enacted. The polluters get the tax subsidies and the politicians get campaign contributions. The free market should be allowed to dictate practical solutions for our energy problems, not government subsidies for politically powerful campaign contributors.

We have the power to solve these problems if we would just use it. The next time there is an election, we should vote the present politicians out and give someone else a chance (see "Throw the Buns Out" on our website, www.dante7.com.) There is no way that new representatives can do a worse job than the present cast. We should continue to vote the incumbents out until we get people who are willing to place the concerns of their constituents over those of the pollution industries.


SCHUYLKILL COUNTY POLITICS EXPOSED

The following is the statement of John H. Schickram as read to the Schuylkill County Board of Commissioners on Wednesday, July 25, 2007.

STATEMENT TO SCHUYLKILL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

From: John H. Schickram

Commissioners:

I would like to discuss with you the actions of Jerome P. Knowles whom you appointed to the Schuylkill County Board of Elections.

As you know, I was a candidate for Schuylkill County Commissioner in the Republican primary election in May and remain a write-in candidate for the general election in November.

In June 2007, at a Lions Club BBQ in Tamaqua, Mr. Knowles approached me and asked me not to wage a write-in campaign for Schuylkill County Commissioner in the November general election.

Since Mr. Knowles is a member of the Schuylkill County Board of Elections and has election responsibilities and since I am a candidate for office in Schuylkill County, I did not think that we should discuss my candidacy and campaign and I walked away from him.

Over the next several days, I received numerous telephone calls from Mr. Knowles inviting me to lunch. I did my best to either avoid his telephone calls or refuse his luncheon invitations.

On Wednesday, July 11th, Mr. Knowles visited my car wash in Tamaqua and left a message inviting me to talk with him.

The next day, I prepared a letter informing Mr. Knowles that I did not think that he should be discussing county politics with a candidate. I mailed the letter to him on the morning of July 13th. A copy of that letter is attached for your inspection.

On Friday, July 13th, Mr. Knowles again visited me at my car wash and again invited me out to lunch. Again, I declined his invitation. Presumably, he had not yet received my letter.

I believe that a member of the Board of Elections should do everything possible to remain impartial and avoid any conflict of interests or even the appearance of a conflict.

I do not believe that Mr. Knowles has exercised good judgment by his repeated attempts to influence my election campaign and I do not believe that you exercised good judgment by appointing him to the Board of Elections.

I would hope that you do everything possible to stop Mr. Knowles from harassing candidates and that you better consider such important appointments in the future.

Thank you.